RaidBench / Editorial Standards

Independent player guidance

Useful answers need receipts, context, and an expiry date.

RaidBench turns patch notes, stable game mechanics, and recurring player questions into practical decision guides. We show where a claim came from, when it was reviewed, and what should trigger another check.

Primary evidenceOfficial sources first
FreshnessVersion-aware reviews
AutomationAI-assisted, source-checked

One page, one decision

Every guide starts with a specific player question. The opening answer should help a player decide what to check, change, avoid, or test next without reading a full encyclopedia first.

Official sources lead

Patch notes, changelogs, and official game announcements are the first reference for version-sensitive claims. Community discussions help identify demand and edge cases, but they do not outrank official change records.

Freshness is visible

Patch-sensitive pages include a review date and, when relevant, a named version or update. A new patch, hotfix, economy shift, or mechanic change places the affected page back into the review queue.

Automation has boundaries

Automated agents monitor approved public sources, group repeated player questions, and prepare drafts. Before publication, source links, dates, numerical claims, and player-facing wording must pass a structured quality check.

No exploit dependency

RaidBench does not build paid value around cheats, account access, real-money trading, or temporary bugs. If a workaround depends on an unresolved bug, it is labeled as unstable or excluded.

Corrections stay simple

Game data changes quickly. To report an outdated claim, send the page URL, the disputed statement, and a current source to [email protected]. Material corrections update the visible review date.

See what changed before following an old guide.

Patch Watch converts official updates into short player-impact summaries and links every conclusion back to its source.

Open Patch Watch