An item you learned and an item still visible in inventory are not the same evidence. Check each state separately before making a transition decision.
Short answerThe supplied official Isles of Abyss announcement documents launch and entry timing, but it does not establish whether learned blueprints, unused recipes, cosmetics, or seasonal progress will persist through a season or scenario change. Create a separate row for every asset, record whether it is learned, equipped, claimed, or still in inventory, and compare that exact state with current official or in-game transition wording. Mark anything not explicitly covered as unclear. Do not consume, discard, move, or rebuild around an item merely because an older answer discusses a similar transition.
Start with the evidence boundary
Prevent the announced Isles of Abyss schedule from being mistaken for a retention policy.
- The publisher announced Isles of Abyss for after maintenance on October 21, 2026 (PT).
- The announcement provides scenario-entry context but does not document retention for the asset categories in this guide.
- Use the schedule as a prompt to prepare, not as proof that a particular asset will remain or reset.
- Treat community discussion as evidence of player uncertainty rather than authority for a game rule.
Record the exact transition
Attach every rule check to the move the player actually intends to make.
- Write down the current scenario or server and the intended destination.
- Record the platform and the transition screen or notice being consulted.
- Note whether the decision occurs before or after the announced October 21 maintenance.
- Begin a new check if the destination, timing, or displayed wording changes.
Separate asset type from asset state
Avoid grouping learned access and inventory objects under one broad carryover label.
- Give each blueprint, recipe, cosmetic, unlock, and seasonal-progress dependency its own row.
- For every row, record whether it is learned, unused in inventory, equipped, claimed, or represented only by progress.
- Copy the relevant current wording without extending it to another state or asset category.
- Use confirmed, excluded, or unclear as the row status.
Apply a source-and-scope test
Decide whether a statement actually covers the player’s asset and transition.
- Prefer current publisher-controlled or in-game transition information for retention decisions.
- Match the wording to the same source, destination, platform, asset type, and asset state.
- Keep every condition or exception attached to the rule it qualifies.
- Leave the row unclear when the wording requires an inference.
Use an uncertainty gate before acting
Protect important state when the available rule does not answer the exact question.
- Capture screenshots of important inventory, learned entries, cosmetics, progress, and transition wording.
- Avoid consuming an unused recipe solely to test an unsupported retention assumption.
- Do not discard or reorganize important items merely to simplify the move.
- Proceed only with decisions whose required rules are confirmed; pause the dependent decisions.
Keep this checklist distinct from broader transition guides
Resolve overlap with existing RaidBench pages while giving this page a narrow job.
- Use this page for the learned-versus-unused state audit.
- Use the character carryover guide to classify account, character, server, and scenario dependencies.
- Use the scenario-choice checklist to compare schedule, group access, and play goals.
- Use the transfer-priority worksheet only after eligibility is confirmed and choices are ready to rank.
Worked example
A player lists four separate rows: a learned furniture formula, an unused recipe object visible in inventory, a cosmetic, and a seasonal unlock. The current transition wording is checked against each row without assuming that one category covers another. If the wording explicitly covers the learned state but says nothing about unused inventory objects, the first row can be marked confirmed while the second remains unclear. The cosmetic and seasonal unlock also remain separate until their exact categories and states are covered. The player saves screenshots and delays only the actions that depend on unresolved rows.
Frequently asked questions
Does the Isles of Abyss announcement confirm what carries over?
No. The supplied announcement gives launch and entry information, but it does not establish retention rules for learned blueprints, unused recipes, cosmetics, or seasonal progress.
Should I use an unused recipe before changing scenarios?
The closed evidence does not support a universal instruction. Check whether current authoritative or in-game wording distinguishes learned access from an unused inventory object. If it does not, preserve the item and mark the decision unclear.
Can I rely on an answer from a previous season?
Only when current authoritative wording shows that the same rule still applies to the same source, destination, platform, asset type, and asset state. Otherwise, use the older answer only to identify what must be checked.
What should I do when one asset is confirmed but another is unclear?
Separate the decisions. Proceed only with the part of the plan supported by confirmed wording, preserve evidence of the unresolved asset, and pause any action that depends on it.
Sources and review notes
E-01 supports the existence of player uncertainty only and is not factual authority. E-02 supports the announced Isles of Abyss launch and entry context but does not establish item or progression retention. All carryover outcomes therefore remain conditional on current publisher-controlled or in-game wording.
Prepared with an automated research workflow and published only after evidence and policy checks.